Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Uninsured/Underinsured Auto Coverage

Did you know that the auto insurance that you have paid for all these years can refuse to pay even if it is clear that you were injured through no fault of your own? Let me give you an example. You are stopped at a light and a drunk hits you. You go to the hospital and everyone knows you are seriously injured. The drunk is arrested and taken to jail for causing the wreck and your medical bills are increasing daily. You learn that the drunk has no insurance, so you make a claim on your insurance under the uninsured portion of your policy. That is why you have been making those payments all these years. You submit all your bills and even send them the police report. You then get a letter stating that they do not have to pay anything until the drunk is found liable and the damages are established. Your medical is now over $40,000.00 and your uninsured coverage is only $50,000.00 clearly they will pay it and not make you hire a lawyer and file a lawsuit right. Wrong. The Texas Supreme Court has expressly permitted this very action and the insurance companies are taking full advantage of it. You may now have to hire a lawyer, file a lawsuit and incur all the cost of filing fees, depositions, etc. to "prove" the drunk was at fault and what your damages are, and once you do all that and get a verdict, you would think you would get the policy limits ($50k in our example), plus your expenses and attorneys fees because you paid those premiums to get treated fairly, but that is not the case. In our example, let's say the jury finds the drunk at fault and awards $150,000.00. The Supreme Court has held that if the policy limits are tendered timely (within 5 days) of the judgment, all they owe is the policy ($50k), no attorneys fees or expenses. So why would an insurance company ever settle an uninsured case for the full value when they know they can make you spend time and money and ultimately will get less. If you think this is wrong, you are right. Let me know your thoughts.

5 comments:

Jerry C said...

Good to know Brent... thanks. Not to reveal my ignorance, but is each state different? Are some companies better than others, or are they all cheesy?

Jerry

Brent said...

Each state is different depending upon their laws. Texas did away with any action for bad faith against insurance companies so there is no down side for them. Pretty much all of them seem to have the same attitude.

Anonymous said...

My good friend and colleague, Brent Carpenter, and I were "talking" via email about his wonderful new blog and he invited me to comment. I also practice personal injury law with an emphasis on car wreck cases. Brent and I agree that we need to remind our clients to take photos with their cell phones while still at the scene of a crash and then don't give up and take more photos at the ER. And by all means, please go to the ER to get checked out if you are having any physical problems. If the saying of "a picture is worth a thousand words" is true, it is absolutely true when trying to prove your case. Congrats, Brent, on a great blog! Larry W. Harrison

jess said...

It's important for people to have this information before they need it, otherwise it's too late! Good tip on taking pics with cell phones as well - it's hard to think about building a case when you need immediate medical attention, but it's necessary.

Anonymous said...

Brent I like the blog alot. Very creative and a good venue to convey information.